Contemporary qualifications for being a prophet
“I think Phillip Yancey is modern day prophet”. These were the words a Christian sister in the Lord expressed to me recently. My response? “Erm, I think Phillip Yancey is a modern day heretic”.
Perhaps, this was a bit too strong, I’m not sure. But I do know this, the one thing that I found so amazing about ‘Whats so amazing about grace, is that it seemed to lack a true biblical definition of grace!
I’m known for being blunt and outspoken at times, I ran the conversation past a friend of mine who responded with a really profound point. He said, “It’s crazy how all the truth compromisers get called prophets these days, if there is one criteria for being a prophet surely it is the willingness not to compromise God’s truth!!”
I have to say I think he is right. During the time of the Todd Bentley meetings, a group came from Wales to Scotland to minister in a near by church. These guys were known as the new mystics, apparently in the same stream as Todd Bentley, John Crowder and Bob Jones. Anyway, these guys were reputed to be ‘cutting edge’ and radical. Real prophets with a huge prophetic mantle. However, after the chaos, which was supposed to be worship, one of the speakers opening words were ‘Jesus did not tell us to preach repentance”. He then went on to try and show that Jesus himself never came to preach repentance.
Someone forgot to tell him that it was pretty much the first words that both he and John the baptist are recorded to have preached!
Someone said to me recently, when I was bemoaning the fact that a church of Scotland minister that I knew hardly seemed to be convicted about the gospel, “but john, your a radical”. Strange, I dont really see an option from a N.T perspective, if what I stand for is indeed ‘radical’. As far as I can see Jesus was radical. As far as I can see, what Christ has called us to is radical. As I read the N.T I see a very radical church, I do not see the sorry excuse for N.T Christianity that is often peddled today.
Back to the person who spoke about Yancey. The person felt that the church needs to move with the times. My response? There is a fine line between cultural relevance and compromise. There is no power in the church because the church has not been faithful to hold on to what God has clearly revealed in His word. Praise God for those fellowships who continue to proclaim an uncompromising gospel with uncomparable power!

November 13th, 2008 at 12:11 am
Christ wasn’t easy going when the house of God had the merchants and everything polluting it, a scourge of small cords was used I believe. At the end of the day we are all responsible in a way for the church as whole, those who have the truth of Gods word must present it as the truth and those who don’t have the truth then at least have the choice. Christ always boldly presented the truth as did the apostles in the face of persecution and long standing tradition and falsehood.
I feel like I’ve completely missed out though as I listen to ravenhill and others. Wheres our radicals in this country, the fundamentalists. I would love to hear a message that challenged and offended me on sunday’s. Brought me to greater repentance. I’ve yet to find it anywhere apart from on sermonaudio.com or reading.
Oh well
November 13th, 2008 at 5:39 am
We just did a whole issue on “prophets and prophecy”. I’d be interested in hearing your take on the different viewpoints we put forth: http://voiceofrevolution.askdrbrown.org/2008/11/11/voice-of-revolution-looks-at-prophets-and-prophecy/
Marcus French
Voice of Revolution
November 13th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Lee, some great points there. Maybe, you need to be that voice in your own generation?
Marcus, thanks for the heads up. I’m mega busy just now, but as soon as I get time I’ll check those articles out. I visited the website,albeit briefly, very interesting.
November 14th, 2008 at 3:53 am
Radical is good! People that don’t preach repentance are probably preaching another Jesus!