My research on the Florida revival put me in touch with a guy named David Eells who opereates a ministry in Florida.
http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=e-book

David very much took the stand that Florida is not of God and it is a demonic deception. Through his ministry I listened to a radio interview with David Eells and Mathew Stephen. Later there was another radio interview with Matthew Stephen, David Eells and Andrew Strom.

Ells offers his book free online, you can follow the link and read it online or order it for free.

Initially with Eells I was very sceptical, then I became hopeful, and later a little more sceptical.

Sovereign God in its early chapters focuses on the Sovereignty of God, Eells points out that scripture is full of God’s sovereignty yet to days preaching is not. I agreed with this whole heartedly and found his first few chapters very refreshing. Eells it seems is a pentecostal calvinist, a very rare breed indeed!

However, the book took an interesting turn. I was really surprised to find out that the second half of the book supported ‘Dominion Theology’, or ‘Kingdom Now Theology’ or also known as ‘Manifest Sons of God’ theology. This view is complex and has many branches however it basicly declares that God has given believers dominion over the curse of the fall. Healing is the divine right of every child of God. The believer can take dominion over nature, circumstances, machinery etc. The book is filed with examples of Healings, deliverances and stories of Eells taking authority over the weather etc.

Dominion Theology apparantly came through the Latter rain movement in the 30’s or 40’s. Apparantly the AoG rejected it is unbiblical and wrote a position paper against it, I have not as yet been able to attain a copy of this document.I found David Eell’s to be a man to be after God, however I think that dominon theology is quite dangerous. so here are a list of some of the things that would cause me to be cautious of his ministry.

  1. Dominion Theology
  2. Healing in the Atonement Theology (based on faulty exegesis)
  3. His emphasis on the Bible Code as a ’sign’ pointing to God’s sovereignty over scripture (he also uses it to back up prophecies)
  4. The fact that many people involved in his ministry have left churches and isolated themselves and surrounded themselves around David.
  5. His lack of willingness to accept medical attention as a valid means of healing (he will always look for the miracle)
  6. His emphasis on his own ‘revelations’ of scripture over and above the interpretations of sound biblical scholarship